As I mentioned in my previous post, there
were several broad themes that emerged out of the panel discussions at the
conference I attended last week. Of these, the most interesting and engaging one
was the topic of storytelling and specifically, the importance of former slaves
to be able to tell their own stories in their own voices.
One of the historians on the panel, David Blight, focused on
Frederick Douglass’s narrative and the meaning of a former slave having not
only the opportunity to tell his story, but also to write it himself. Those of
us who take the ability to read and write for granted will likely take some time
to grasp the magnitude of such an accomplishment. With the written words,
Douglass’s voice materialized and was able to reach a bigger audience. In his
case, learning how to read and write set him on the path to freedom.
The significance of storytelling in the context of
human trafficking cannot be overstated; however, I think there definitely needs
to be a warning against sensationalistic attitudes. Since human trafficking
seems to be the issue of the day, I continue to see many celebrities become
involved and perform songs or direct movies around what they imagine the issue
to be. Their intentions might be good, but are they truly able to represent the
challenges and transformation that a survivor of the practice has to face? As
Alicia Peters, an academic, pointed out, the overemphasis in the media on sex
trafficking of young girls shifts the discussion of the issue in one very
specific direction and many survivors in different trafficking circumstances
become overlooked. Ultimately, the story told in the media is not inclusive of
the variety of human trafficking situations and many will not be able to see
themselves in the story and perhaps assume that their situation is not as bad. Peters
further stressed that every trafficking survivor’s experience is unique and the
prominence of one particular narrative renders many others invisible on the background
of an already hidden crime. She eventually concluded that the type of trafficking
should not be the main focus of discussions; rather, it is the condition of
exploitation, complete lack of choice, and utter misery that should be
regarded. I completely agree. Suffering in any form is unacceptable and no one
situation of exploitation is worse than another.
It is interesting that the topic of storytelling
came up in a workshop I attended right before driving to the conference. The
focus of the seminar was documentary storytelling, or how to tell the story of
your organization through videos. Two major points made were that it is important
to allow the actual people you work with to tell their stories and that the
story must be representative of the actual transformation the population goes
through. These points definitely resonate with the conclusions made by many
panelists at the conference. Zoe Todd, for example, elaborated on the power of
an image and narratives as vital tools in the protest against injustice.
In conclusion, storytelling is important not because
it allows the media to sensationalize a horrendous crime, but because it allows
survivors to define the crime in their own words and to ultimately set
themselves on the path to freedom. Therefore, it is crucial that we, as
advocates, do not end up abusing the narrative to obtain some goal we have
deemed worthy. Telling the story for survivors further keeps them in a
situation of dependency. Allowing them to share their experiences in their own
way, at their own pace, leads to empowerment and to a future of no exploitation
for them.
-
Krasi
No comments:
Post a Comment